Dear Freesurfers,
I have performed a permutation test with the command:
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005 --sim mc-z 10000
THRESHOLD csd --sim-sign pos --seed 1297708255
And after that I have obtained the clusters with:
mri_surfcluster --subject CNTRL_MCI_RAFA_average –mask
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/mask.mgh --sum
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/contrast/clustsum.txt --in
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/contrast/sig.mgh --cwsig
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/contrast/cwsig.mgh --vwsig
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/contrast/vwsig.mgh --sign pos --csd
rh.fsgd_subj_gauss005/csd/csd.j001-contrast.csd
I’ve did it over the same dataset but with two different thresholds,
THRESHOLD: 2.301 (pvalue=0.005) and 1.301 (pvalue=0.05). As far I know
the cwsig.mgh resulting using the 1.3 threshold should be similar than
the cwsig.mgh from the second thr, but with a more restrictive
significative clusters (some coloured areas should disappear, in other
words, clusters returned in the first case should be included in
clusters returned by the 1.3 threshold). My results didn’t show that
behaviour, some of the cwsig clusters can be contained in the other,
but others don’t (see attached Figure). It is my reasoning correct? If
so, why the images mismatching?
Thank you all in advance.
Rafa.