Freesurfer

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

17 participants
30086 discussions

Re: [Freesurfer] Out of memory error on mri_cvs_register
by Lilla Zollei 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Hi Mohammadi-Nejad, The creation of the non-linear deformation field will require more memory than what you currently have and that is causing the problem. Is there any way you can assign twice (or at least 1.5x) as much memory to this process as you are currently using? Lilla On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad wrote: > Thank you! > The command is : "mri_cvs_register --mov 001 --template 000". > The error is: > [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message ------------------------------------ > [0]PETSC ERROR: Out of memory. This could be due to allocating > [0]PETSC ERROR: too large an object or bleeding by not properly > [0]PETSC ERROR: destroying unneeded objects. > [0]PETSC ERROR: Memory allocated 0 Memory used by process -2147483648 > [0]PETSC ERROR: Try running with -malloc_dump or -malloc_log for info. > [0]PETSC ERROR: Memory requested 2391628012! > > Also in the attached file you can find the log of this command. > > Best regards, > Mohammadi-Nejad > > > > On Monday, September 29, 2014 2:12 PM, Lilla Zollei <lzollei(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > > Hi Mohammadi-Nejad, > > Could you include the command that you submitted and the error message and > log file from when the process terminated? > > Lilla > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad wrote: > > > Hi > > I am trying to do an mri_cvs_register for two subjects analyzed with FS-5.1.0 on a 64-bit CentOS linux vmware on a 64 bit windows 7 with 16GB memory. I am running a signle mri_cvs_register and after certain time the process terminates with out of memory error. > > I have done this work a lot of times with different preprocessed subjects. > > Could you please let me to know that, How can I solve this problem? > > > > Best regards, > > Mohammadi-Nejad > > > > > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > >

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Overclocking CPU for Freesurfer
by Jonca, Jacek 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

As Matt pointed out for as long as you achieve a stable overclock and have ample cooling for the CPU and memory freesurfer (and any other programs) will run just fine. I used to run subjects on Intel Q6600 overclocked from 2.8ghz to 3.4ghz with a push-pull cooling solution and had no problems. Greetings, Jacek Jońca-Jasiński [TTU_DblT_fl4C] Jacek Jońca-Jasiński, Ph.D. Director The Graduate School Administration Bldg 328 / 40D | 2625 Memorial Circle Box 41030 | Lubbock, TX 79409-1030 T 806.834.3348 | F 806.742.4038 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chiu, Bryan (PHTH) <bryan.chiu(a)ubc.ca<mailto:bryan.chiu@ubc.ca>> Date: Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM Subject: [Freesurfer] Overclocking CPU for Freesurfer To: "freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> Hi, Is anyone aware of any issues that arise from overclocking and using Freesurfer? I was looking to see how much it would speed up recon-all with OpenMP using a stable overclock. _______________________________________ Bryan Chiu Undergraduate Research Assistant Aging, Mobility, and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

1 0

LME Models
by Karishma Smart 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Dear Freesurfers, This is a repeat question as either I did not see the response to the intial query (I apologise in that case!) or it was never answered. I am planning to do a longitudinal analysis. After I have processed the data through a longitudinal stream, should I use the LME model? I understand it is the most highly recommended for a comprehensive analysis; however the Freesurfer webpage says it is for univariate and mass-univariate analyses only. I would like to do a multivariate analysis. Can I still use the Matlab LME model? If not, is there an alternative way to do this? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks! Karishma -- Karishma Smart B.A. Biological Sciences Cornell University Class of 2013 Boston University School of Graduate Medical Sciences Class of 2015

2 1

Re: [Freesurfer] Overclocking CPU for Freesurfer
by Matt Glasser 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

It will just run faster so long as things like memtest86 and prime95 don¹t have errors. Peace, Matt. From: "Chiu, Bryan (PHTH)" <bryan.chiu(a)ubc.ca> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Monday, September 29, 2014 at 4:26 PM To: "freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Overclocking CPU for Freesurfer Hi, Is anyone aware of any issues that arise from overclocking and using Freesurfer? I was looking to see how much it would speed up recon-all with OpenMP using a stable overclock. _______________________________________ Bryan Chiu Undergraduate Research Assistant Aging, Mobility, and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

1 0

Overclocking CPU for Freesurfer
by Chiu, Bryan (PHTH) 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Hi, Is anyone aware of any issues that arise from overclocking and using Freesurfer? I was looking to see how much it would speed up recon-all with OpenMP using a stable overclock. _______________________________________ Bryan Chiu Undergraduate Research Assistant Aging, Mobility, and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia

1 0

Pial Surface Incorrect For Native T1
by Zachary Greenberg 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Hello Freesurfer experts, I am having a tough time getting my pial surfaces into the correct anatomical space. I work with ECoG Patients, so we have pre-implant high resolution T1s (GE SPGR), and post-implant high resolution CTs that show the location of ECoG electrodes within the patient's skull. Our goal: display ECoG electrodes in their correct positions on the patient's native pial surface. Right now, my pipeline works like this: -ACPC align the T1, leave it in LAS orientation. -recon-all the acpc T1, using -3T -all -openmp 8 -use-gpu -corregister the CT to the acpc T1 (SPM), get electrode coords in T1 space -plot the electrodes on the resultant .pial surface from freesurfer The problem is, I can definitely tell that the position of the pial mesh is off (probably by 10 millimeters or so), as the electrodes (which have the correct coordinates from the T1 correg, confirmed visually by overlaying the CT on T1) are not in their correct positions on the mesh. Likewise, DTI fibers reconstructed from EPIs correctly corregistered to the T1 also appear off position within the .pial mesh. Here is what I have tried: compute the transform from .pial to .pial.native as suggested on https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsAnat-to-NativeAnat tkregister2 --mov rawavg.mgz --targ orig.mgz --reg register.native.dat --noedit --regheader mri_surf2surf --sval-xyz pial --reg register.native.dat rawavg.mgz --tval lh.pial.native --tval-xyz --hemi lh --s subjectname This results in a mesh that is flipped (left is right) and rotated such that anterior is inferior (frontal cortex is pointing downward). The mesh appears this way when plotted in any viewer besides freesurfer (MATLAB mesh, Pyqt) but appears in the correct orientation in freeview. Replacing orig.mgz with the original T1.nii in the command above produces the opposite effect, freeview plots the orientation wrong, and any other viewer plots the Mesh oriented correctly, and the mesh appears to be identical to the originally output .pial mesh (electrodes are still wrong). Any help in pin pointing what is going wrong here would be greatly appreciated. I have a feeling it has something to do with the mesh being in surface RAS and the original T1 being in LAS. Thanks a bunch, -Zack

2 5

mri_watershed problems
by Sam Zorowitz 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Dear Freesurfer community, I am running into issues with mri_watershed, which I am using the create the BEM surfaces. In testing different preflooding height threshold (recommended for accurate skull-stripping), I am running into the issues that an -h 56 produces results where the cerebellum is stripped away, but -h 57 leaves far too much non-brain material in the image. As a result, my BEM surfaces are unrepresentative of the brain (either shrunken in or enlarged). I do, however, already have a satisfying brain-mask. Is there a way to pass the brain mask to mri_watershed to create new BEM surfaces without it creating a new brain mask? Sam Zorowitz Clinical Research Coordinator Division of Neurotherapeutics Department of Psychiatry: Neurosciences Massachusetts General Hospital 149 13th Street, Rm 2620e Charlestown, MA 02129

1 0

how to deal with a big brain lesion?
by Abel Lei 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Hi FreeSurfer experts, I happen to have a participant whose brain lesion from stroke (hemorrhage) distributed over a wide area. Therefore, the recon-all result is showing a big whole, about half a size of the cortex, on the anterior part of the left hemisphere corresponding to the lesion site. When I checked the previous mails, it is recommended to edit the WM volume for the whole caused by lesions: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/WhiteMatterEdits_freev… But because the size of the lesion is so big, involving more than 100 slides coronally, the process to fill the lesion area by Voxel Edit will be as long as tracing the lesion manually slide by slide. I wonder if you would have other suggestions to correct such a big geometric accuracy. Please let me know if you need other info. Thank you so much for your help! -Abel

1 0

Out of memory error on mri_cvs_register
by Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Hi I am trying to do an mri_cvs_register for two subjects analyzed with FS-5.1.0 on a 64-bit CentOS linux vmware on a 64 bit windows 7 with 16GB memory. I am running a signle mri_cvs_register and after certain time the process terminates with out of memory error. I have done this work a lot of times with different preprocessed subjects. Could you please let me to know that, How can I solve this problem? Best regards, Mohammadi-Nejad

2 1

Functional Overlay onto Structural
by Chiu, Bryan (PHTH) 28 Sep '14

28 Sep '14

Hi, I need to overlay some functional imaging data onto a structural scan to create some figures. How would I do this? I tried an older tutorial but it seems the files don't exist anymore in the tutorial dataset (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/Visualization) However the image provided is what I would like to create as a figure. It is not necessary to overlay onto the participants brain and could easily get away with overlaying it on a standard brain. I was given analysis files from FSL. Namely the one I was told to overlay was *.nii.gz file following the FEAT analysis from FSL. Regards in advance. _______________________________________ Bryan Chiu Undergraduate Research Assistant Aging, Mobility, and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer