Freesurfer

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

18 participants
30131 discussions

Non-human primate surface template
by MCLAREN, Donald 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

Dear all, Does anyone have or is perhaps working on a surface template for the rhesus macaque brain? -- Best Regards, Donald McLaren ===================== Support the Alzheimer's Association Memory Walk 2009 ~~~ Join the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center team or make a donation. http://madison.kintera.org/2009/donaldmclaren ================= D.G. McLaren University of Wisconsin - Madison Neuroscience Training Program Office: (608) 265-9672 Lab: (608) 256-1901 ext 12914 ===================== This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (608) 265-9672 or email.

1 0

mri_surf2surf --cortex
by DRC SPM 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

Dear FreeSurfers, Please can you explain how mri_surf2surf's --cortex option for smoothing is implemented? I assumed it would be along the following lines: - mask the data to zero-out the medial wall - smooth this masked data - smooth the mask itself - divide the smoothed data by the smoothed mask - (perhaps) re-mask the data But I've tried doing that long-hand (i.e. calling mri_surf2surf without the --cortex flag for each smoothing, and using l load_mgh and save_mgh in MATLAB for the rest), and it doesn't seem to quite match the results of the --cortex flag. Now I'm guessing that it instead might do something like the following. For each connected-neighbour iteration of the smoothing, only include the neighbour in the average if it is inside the cortex (not medial wall). However, I can't easily/lazily reimplement this to check, so could someone reveal the truth? ;-) Many thanks, Ged

2 3

new release v4.5.0
by Nick Schmansky 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

A new freesurfer release is now available, v4.5.0: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Download The release notes page describes the bug fixes and new features: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReleaseNotes Mainly this release is intended to make available necessary improvements to the longitudinal analysis stream. Freesurfer team

1 0

the space for sphere registration
by Zhong Jidan 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

Hi, In Freesurfer, we use recon-all to create the white, pial, inflated, spherical surface of each subject. And the sphere registration is done between the subject and the sphere template. I want to know that, what space are the spheres in? Do you do any translation and rotation for the sphere created to make them in the same space as the template? Or do you just leave them in their own space and do registration? -- Regards, Jidan

2 1

talairach.xfm p=0.0000 error, brainmask.mgz not created
by Prantik Kundu 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Hello In default FS usage, all of the MPRAGE's from this particular study that I'm analyzing are dying with the error shown below. MPRAGE's from other studies appear to be processed just fine. The MPRAGEs from the experiment that FS is failing on are generally of higher quality than those where FS is succeeding. The failure seems to be happening even before brainmask.mgz is being created. When I turn off the automated tlrc checking, then brainmask.mgz is created but of very poor quality. This is reproducible on Linux 32 and 64 bit as well as OSX. Please help. -Prantik FROM recon-all.log : __________________________________________________________________ Mon Aug 10 14:05:54 EDT 2009 talairach_avi done cp transforms/talairach.auto.xfm transforms/talairach.xfm #-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Failure Detection Mon Aug 10 14:05:55 EDT 2009 /home/kundup/FS_SUBJECTS/BrVi.S06/mri talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm ERROR: talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm ***FAILED*** (p=0.0000, pval=0.0000 < threshold=0.0050) Linux cadmium 2.6.28-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Sat Jul 25 01:19:55 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all exited with ERRORS at Mon Aug 10 14:05:55 EDT 2009

2 1

MS lesions
by Jose Soares 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Hi, what kind of information can I get with FreeSUrfer about MS lesions? Number of lesions? Lesion volume? Thanks, Miguel. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com

3 2

Less smoothing in version 4.1 than 4.0?
by DRC SPM 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Dear FreeSurfers, My apologies if this is mentioned in the release notes, but I couldn't find it with a quick search. I'm using the following command to smooth some data: mri_surf2surf --hemi rh --s average --sval in.mgh --fwhm 20 --tval out.mgh Under FreeSurfer version 4.0.3, part of the output is: Reading in average area average/surf/rh.white.avg.area.mgh Approximating gaussian smoothing of target with fwhm = 20.000000, std = 8.493218, with 379 iterations of nearest-neighbor smoothing Whereas under FreeSurfer version 4.1.0, I see: Reading in average area average/surf/rh.white.avg.area.mgh INFO: fwhm2niters: Fixing group surface area Approximating gaussian smoothing of target with fwhm = 20.000000, std = 8.493218, with 290 iterations of nearest-neighbor smoothing It seems that there is less actual smoothing occurring for the same requested FWHM (unless the altered surface area estimate cancels out somewhere else?), is that correct? Since the 20mm itself was fairly arbitrarily chosen in my lab, I'm wondering whether it would make sense to increase this to get the same number of iterations (on the same data) with the newer version, so that results are smoothed by the same amount. Is there a way of adjusting the FWHM to undo the effect of the above fwhm2niters fix? Thanks, Ged P.S. I realise that 4.1.0 is not exactly "new" itself... I'd also be interested to know whether this has changed again in more recent versions. Thanks!

2 1

converting .img to .nii
by Ritobrato Datta 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Hello All, I am trying to convert [wri@home] /jet/subjects/002/Anatomy> mri_convert nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.img nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.nii mri_convert nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.img nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.nii $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.146.2.5 2009/04/08 18:40:23 nicks Exp $ reading from nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.img... ----------------------------------------------------------------- INFO: could not find /jet/subjects/002/Anatomy/nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.mat file for direction cosine info. INFO: use Analyze 7.5 hdr->hist.orient value: 0, transverse unflipped (default). INFO: if not valid, please provide the information in /jet/subjects/002/Anatomy/nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.mat file ----------------------------------------------------------------- TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, 0) j_ras = (0, 1, 0) k_ras = (0, 0, 1) writing to nAnatomical_fsl_FLOAT.nii... It wrote the .nii file and it looks the same as the .img qualitatively, but I just thought I ask if I need the .mat file or if there is a better way to compare whether the conversion worked correctly. Please let me know. Thx Ri

2 1

question about talairach transform used in skullstrip
by Guang Zeng 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Hi, there, In the skullstrip step, mri_em_register command is called and a talairach_with_skull.lta file is produced. This lta file will be used in the following mri_watershed command. My questions are: (1) Once we got the brainmask.auto.mgz, which command we can use to inverse the talairach transform, convert the coordinate to the original system? (2) How different it will be if no altas is used in the mri_watershed step? Thanks a lot! Guang _________________________________________________________________ Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHYCB_Back…

2 1

tksurfer display
by corinna bauer 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

When I run tksurfer, only portions of the cuneus, lateral occipital, and superior parietal regions are displayed. This occurs in both FS versions 4.2.0 and 4.4.0. I am using a 32 bit BU Linux system which is equivalent to redhat 5.0. The error message is similar to those in previous posts, but previous suggestions don't seem to help. surfer: current subjects dir: /home/freesurfer4.2.0/subjects/corinna/PET surfer: not in "scripts" dir ==> using cwd for session root surfer: session root data dir ($session) set to: surfer: /home/freesurfer4.2.0/subjects/corinna/PET surfer: Reading header info from /home/freesurfer4.2.0/subjects/corinna/PET/003_S_1059/mri/T1.mgz surfer: vertices=119899, faces=239794 Loading /home/freesurfer4.2.0/surface_labels.txt surfer: ### redraw failed: no gl window open surfer: single buffered window surfer: tkoInitWindow(003_S_1059) surfer: using interface /home/freesurfer4.2.0/lib/tcl/tksurfer.tcl Reading /home/freesurfer4.2.0/lib/tcl/tkm_common.tcl Reading /home/freesurfer4.2.0/lib/tcl/tkm_wrappers.tcl Reading /home/freesurfer4.2.0/lib/tcl/fsgdfPlot.tcl Reading /home/freesurfer4.2.0/lib/tcl/tkUtils.tcl Successfully parsed tksurfer.tcl reading white matter vertex locations...

3 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer