Dear list,
I am interested in the S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse label from the Desitreux atlas using aparc.a2005s.annot.
If I load this into fsaverage, it has three regions to it (see dark purple label in the attached screenshot): two big ones, very close to each other, connected by two narrow bridges, and another much smaller region more dorsally.
Does this look fine to you?!
Secondly, assuming this is ok, I created labels for each subject using mri_annotation2label and turned those labels into ROIs in standard space using
mri_label2vol --label xx/label/lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label --temp xx/reg_standard/example_func.nii.gz --reg xx/reg/freesurfer/anat2std.register.dat --o xx/reg_standard/stats/lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.nii.gz
However, when I load this volume with:
tksurfer fsaverage lh inflated -overlay lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.nii.gz -mni152reg -fthresh 0.1 -fmax 1
it looks a bit off (see yellow label and red ROI in second screenshot).
Would you think that's still ok taking into account the individual anatomy or did something go wrong somewhere?
Thanks for your help,
Esther
