Hi Bruce,
Where may I find more information about the differences in recon-all or subcortical segmentations (aseg) between 5.3 and 6.0?
Is the 6.0 pipeline still based on this paper?
Fischl, B., Salat, D. H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., … Dale, A. M. (2002). Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron, 33(3), 341–355.
If not, could you please shed some light on the improvements in 6.0?
Thanks a lot.
S -- Shane Schofield
On 27 February 2017 at 23:40:12, Bruce Fischl (fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) wrote:
Hi weiwei
if the aseg looks good you don't have to worry about how the subcortical structures look in the brainmask - it's irrelevant. Not sure about the pial surfaces - we find the surfaces in 6.0 more accurate than 5.3, but maybe not for your specific sequence? It's hard to say
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, ? ? wrote:
dear FS community: now i have more than 200 subjects which already finished recon-all with 5.3, since 6.0 released, i wonder should i re-run them with 6.0 as lots of changes like different surf-map and registration. i ran a bit of them as test and i found the pial problems were more than 5.3, and it seems some subcortical structures were vanished in the brainmask.mgz, though the aseg.mgz looked good. i wanna ask is my problem serious or it is usual with 6.0, and which version you think is better for cortical volume and surface thickness reserch? best regards weiwei west china hospital _____________________________________________________________________________________ weiqi77777@live.com _______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline%C2%A0. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.