No, I don't think so Bruce
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation because it's better. Does that make sense?
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bruce, I uploaded a subject.
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer