Hello Freesurfers,
We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Hi Bruce, I uploaded a subject.
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation because it's better. Does that make sense?
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce, I uploaded a subject.
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
No, I don't think so Bruce
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation because it's better. Does that make sense?
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bruce, I uploaded a subject.
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you for clarifying this.
Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
No, I don't think so Bruce
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastephan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation because it's better. Does that make sense?
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan <mikaelastephan@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Bruce, I uploaded a subject.
Thanks! Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl < fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look cheers Bruce On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers, We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
Thanks! Mihaela
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
Mihaela Stefan