Hi,
I run the command for each BA labels of the right hemisphere and then run:
[user@host87 Freesurfer]$ mris_anatomical_stats -mgz -f ../stats/rh.BA.thresh.stats -b -a ./rh.BA.annot -c ./BA.ctab SUBJECT rh white
Which resulted in:
INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. computing statistics for each annotation in ./rh.BA.annot. reading volume /home/user/visao/Freesurfer//ANTONIOVELOSO_2/mri/wm.mgz... reading input surface /home/user/visao/Freesurfer//ANTONIOVELOSO_2/surf/rh.white... reading input pial surface /home/user/visao/Freesurfer//ANTONIOVELOSO_2/surf/rh.pial... reading input white surface /home/user/visao/Freesurfer//ANTONIOVELOSO_2/surf/rh.white... could not read annot file ./rh.BA.annot No such file or directory mris_anatomical_stats: could not read annotation file ./rh.BA.annot No such file or directory
What is wrong? Is there a way to run everything that is needed to get the BA stats at once using the BAxxx.thresh.label?
Thank you, Andreia
Quoting Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
If you replace *every* occurence of BAxxx.label with BAxxx.thresh.label, this will keep things simple and you won't have to worry about which one is input and which one is output.
Run *all* the commands from the "BA labels" section, all the way to the end of that section, this will get you to the stats.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote:
Ok. So the first is the input and the second is the output, correct? So I'll have a different file for each out put? Is it possible to have a table with the different measures after the threshold?
Thank you very much and I apologize for the naive questions...
Andreia
Quoting Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
What you call the output label is up to you. What you call the input label is more important - it has to be a file that actually exists.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote:
Ah ok! Sorry... In both places?
Quoting Anastasia Yendiki ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: It's .thresh.label, not .threshold.label. > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > Hi Anastasia! > The command in the recon-all.log is this one: > mri_label2label --srcsubject fsaverage --srclabel > > > >
/home/user/visao/Freesurfer/fsaverage/label/rh.BA1.label
--trgsubject SUSANAFERREIRA --trglabel ./rh.BA1.label --hemi
rh > > > > --regmethod surface
> And I tried substituing BAxxx.label by BAxxx.thresh.label
like > > > > this:
> mri_label2label --srcsubject fsaverage --srclabel
/home/user/visao/Freesurfer/fsaverage/label/lh.BA1.threshold.label > > >
--trgsubject SUSANAFERREIRA --trglabel
./lh.BA1.thresolh.label --hemi lh --regmethod surface > gave an error : > SUBJECTS_DIR /home/user/visao/Freesurfer/ FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer Loading source label. No such file or directory mri_label2label: could not open label file > > > >
/home/user/visao/Freesurfer/fsaverage/label/lh.BA1.threshold.label
Illegal seek ERROR reading > > > >
/home/user/visao/Freesurfer/fsaverage/label/lh.BA1.threshold.label
> Thus, I substitued only in the second BAxxx.label and it
worked. I > > > > > thought that was it, but then the values
were the same. I'm sorry, I'm not sure what is missing. > Thank you! > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Anastasia Yendiki > > > > > > > > > > > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: > > Hi Andreia - What you're rerunning is using BAxxx.label
instead > > > > > of
> BAxxx.thresh.label. So of course the results will be the
same as > > > > before
> you copied over the BAxxx.thresh.label files, b/c these
new files > > > > > > aren't
> being used in 5.0. > > > You'll need to find the "BA labels" section in
recon-all.log > > > > > > and rerun
> those commands yourself, changing every BAxxx.label to > > > > BAxxx.thresh.label. > > > Hope this helps, > a.y > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > Hello list! > > > > > Any suggestions on what I may be doing wrong? > > > > > Thanks! > > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Mensagem encaminhada de > > > > > > > > > > > > _andreia_@sapo.pt ----- > > Data: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:11:13 +0000 > > De: _andreia_@sapo.pt > > Assunto: Re: [Freesurfer] Brodmann area thickness,
surface area > > > > > and > > > volume
> > Para: Anastasia Yendiki
ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu, > > > > > > > > freesurfer
> > freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > Cc: Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > I want to study Brodmann Areas cortical thickness,
surface > > > > > > > > area and
> > volume. I've added the 5.2 BAxxx.threshold.label to my
5.0 > > > > > fsaverage
> > and run the recon-all BA labels command. Now I run > > > aparcstats2table > > and get a table with the values but they are the same as before > > running the BAxxx.threshold.label. > > > > > So, everything is working but the values haven't
changed. > > > > > > > > Am I > > > missing
> > something? Do I need to run any other command so to the > > > threshold > > > have > > effect? > > > > > Andreia > > > > > > > > Quoting Anastasia Yendiki > > > > > > > > > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: > > > > > > Sounds like centos4 is probably the safest bet
for you, > > > > > > > > > although > > > > you
> > > should ask the list this question. > > > > > > > Sorry, I don't know what values you want to
get in a > > > > > > > > > > table.
> > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > > Ah ok! Anyway, I'm thinking of working with
5.2, > > > > > > > > > > > should I > > > > > download
> > > > the version for centOS 4 then? > > > > > > > > > After running the new BAxxx.thresh.label
files how > > > > > > > > > > > > can I get the
> > > > values in a table? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting
Anastasia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yendiki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
> > > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter. You just need to use
those > > > > > > > > > > > > > .label files from
> > > > > the fsaverage directory in the 5.2 distritbution.
You > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > need
> > > > > to run any of the executables from the 5.2 distribution. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm using Centos5, which file should
I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > download? The one for
> > > > > > CentOS 6 or > 4? > > > > > > > > Quoting Anastasia Yendiki > > > > > > > > > ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: > > > > > > > > You'll need to go to the section of
recon-all.log > > > > > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > heading "BA > > labels". You'll need to rerun
the > > > > > > > > > > commands > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > that section, but instead > > of using the
BAxxx.label > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > files, us
> > > > > > > the BAxxx.thresh.label files, which > > you'll
find in > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > fsaverage subject dir in the 5.2 distribution. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Anastasia, > > > > > > > > > How should I proceed to get the
different BAs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measures
> > > > > > > output with > > > > FS > 5.0? > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Anastasia Yendiki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The thresholded labels are in the 5.2
version > > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > fsaverage > > > > > under: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/fsaverage/label/*.thresh.label > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Bruce Fischl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Anastasia? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, _andreia_@sapo.pt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, that was my guess... I am
running > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > >
> > a > > > > > > > deadline, > > > > > > > any > > > > > news on > > > > > > > > > > > automatically computing the correct > > > > > > > > > > > > threshold > > > > > > > > > > > >
script?
> > > > > > > Will I > > > > > > be > > > > able to > > > > > > > > > > > use it in 5.0? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Bruce Fischl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes. Surface area will be
the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > affected > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > much > > > > > > > more than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > (and > > > > > > > > > > > volume of > > > > > > > > > course
scales > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > area)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _andreia_@sapo.pt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the quick response! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meanwhile, does
that also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apply > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > volume? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting Bruce Fischl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Andreia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the issue is that the
BA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > labels > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
contain
> > > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > > point > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> has > > > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > non-zero > > > > > > > > > > > > > > probability (no matter how
small!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > >
> > > being > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > label. > > > > > >
So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > label area is almost
certainly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > always > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bigger > > > > > > > than the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
actual > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BA. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anastasia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has some scripts for
automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > computing > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > correct > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > threshold, > > > > > > > > > > > > and I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > believe she and Nick
integrated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > them > > > > > > >
> > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.2 > > > > > > > so that > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > stats > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > computed both thresholded
and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
unthresholded, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hopefully > > > > > > >
they > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri,
22 Mar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _andreia_@sapo.pt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm using FS 5.0
and some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ago I > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > told by > > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > >
was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> > > > > > > > Bruce that I had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > threshold the BA in order
to have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > approximate > > > > > > > > > > area > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approximate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approximate > > > > > > > > >
approximate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approximate > > > >
> > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> overlaying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the inflated surface.
To get > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > surface > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > area > > > > > > > values > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > values > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > values > > > > > > > > > >
values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > values > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > need to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the label_area and put a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > threshold > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having the possibility to
choose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > surface > > > > > > > that I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > want, > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > either > > > > > > > > > > > > > > white > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or pial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I can also
get the BA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stats in a > > > > > > > table > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > table > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > table > > > > > > > > > > > > table > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > table > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > subjects and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > areas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > using either > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mris_anatomical_stats (on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > label) > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > usinga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> script by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jamaan to get the table
(since I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > have the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ?.BA.stats >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> files), > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is,
which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > better/correct > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
way > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > get the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and surface area values
of the BA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > export > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > statistical >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > >
for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> analysis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since there are the
thresolds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to study
mainly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cortical > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
thickness > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > surface > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > area but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look also at the volume (which is > > > > > > > surface-based, > > > > > > > > > > thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thickness*surface are
will not be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > volume > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > average > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from each label, right?). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I' not sure of
which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now... > > > > > > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it depend on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measure I'll be using? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andreia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freesurfer mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freesurfer mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The information
in this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only
for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
person to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> whom > > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed. If you believe
this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > e-mail > > > > > > > > >
> > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sent > > > > > > > to you > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > >
error > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and > > > the > > > > > > > > > e-mail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contains patient
information, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contact > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Partners > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Compliance > > > > > > > > > > > > HelpLine at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.partners.org/complianceline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > e-mail was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > sent > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > you in error > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but does not contain
patient > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > information, > > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > > contact > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > > > > please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sender > > > > > > > > > > > > and properly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mensagem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reenviada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > > > >