I see. Usually we start with a sphere, and create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects, then remake the template with those Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi Bruce,
The workflow that I mentioned from the wiki is for creating a new template in the absence of any ?.sphere.reg files; here's relevant language from the webpage:
"Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)
(This section reports on what I (GW) have learned of the registration process from Bruce Fischl. and Doug Greve, along with reading the source code. I have not actually tried it.)
The process of creating a template involves calculating a "mean" (across subjects) pattern of curvature-related values, along with the variance of these variables. This task is performed by program mris_make_template. However, mris_make_template expects the input subjects to be already aligned (ie: already have ?h.sphere.reg files). This of course will not be the case if you are about to create a template!"
This is context for my question.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi David
usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote: Hi everyone, If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects? I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates (in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.) Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano (P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.