Hi everyone,
If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects?
I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates
(in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template
only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.)
Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano
(P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)
Hi David
usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi everyone,
If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects?
I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates
(in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template
only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.)
Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano
(P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)
Hi Bruce,
The workflow that I mentioned from the wiki is for creating a new template in the absence of any ?.sphere.reg files; here's relevant language from the webpage:
---------------- "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)
(This section reports on what I (GW) have learned of the registration process from Bruce Fischl. and Doug Greve, along with reading the source code. I have not actually tried it.) The process of creating a template involves calculating a "mean" (across subjects) pattern of curvature-related values, along with the variance of these variables. This task is performed by program mris_make_templatehttps://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template. However, mris_make_template expects the input subjects to be already aligned (ie: already have ?h.sphere.reg files). This of course will not be the case if you are about to create a template!" ----------------
This is context for my question.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
Hi David
usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi everyone,
If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects?
I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu/fswiki/**SurfaceRegAndTemplateshttps://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates
(in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_**template<https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template>only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.)
Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano
(P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
I see. Usually we start with a sphere, and create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects, then remake the template with those Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi Bruce,
The workflow that I mentioned from the wiki is for creating a new template in the absence of any ?.sphere.reg files; here's relevant language from the webpage:
"Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)
(This section reports on what I (GW) have learned of the registration process from Bruce Fischl. and Doug Greve, along with reading the source code. I have not actually tried it.)
The process of creating a template involves calculating a "mean" (across subjects) pattern of curvature-related values, along with the variance of these variables. This task is performed by program mris_make_template. However, mris_make_template expects the input subjects to be already aligned (ie: already have ?h.sphere.reg files). This of course will not be the case if you are about to create a template!"
This is context for my question.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi David
usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote: Hi everyone, If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects? I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates (in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.) Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano (P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Suppose the subjects were from a species of primate that has never been scanned before, and that native spheres have been found for each subject -- how would you create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects in that case?
From the webpage I mentioned, it seems that it suggests repeated
applications of mris_make_template to increasingly large subsets of the original collection, but I can't tell from the webpage or the wiki for mris_make_template whether more than just native spheres and convexity information are needed. Does the approach you refer to need any more than that?
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
I see. Usually we start with a sphere, and create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects, then remake the template with those
Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi Bruce,
The workflow that I mentioned from the wiki is for creating a new template in the absence of any ?.sphere.reg files; here's relevant language from the webpage:
"Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)
(This section reports on what I (GW) have learned of the registration process from Bruce Fischl. and Doug Greve, along with reading the source code. I have not actually tried it.)
The process of creating a template involves calculating a "mean" (across subjects) pattern of curvature-related values, along with the variance of these variables. This task is performed by program mris_make_template. However, mris_make_template expects the input subjects to be already aligned (ie: already have ?h.sphere.reg files). This of course will not be the case if you are about to create a template!"
This is context for my question.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi David
usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote: Hi everyone, If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects? I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu/fswiki/**SurfaceRegAndTemplateshttps://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates
(in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_**template https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template
only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.) Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano (P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.)The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/**compliancelinehttp://www.partners.org/complianceline. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi David
I would do what I suggested:
1. Create a template froma ?h.sphere. 2. Register a bunch of subjects to the template to create a bunch of shpere.reg files. 3. Rebuild the template from the sphere.reg files. 4. Register to this one 5. Rebuild the template
cheers Bruce
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Suppose the subjects were from a species of primate that has never been scanned before, and that native spheres have been found for each subject -- how would you create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects in that case? From the webpage I mentioned, it seems that it suggests repeated applications of mris_make_template to increasingly large subsets of the original collection, but I can't tell from the webpage or the wiki for mris_make_template whether more than just native spheres and convexity information are needed. Does the approach you refer to need any more than that?
Thanks, David
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: I see. Usually we start with a sphere, and create a sphere.reg for a bunch of subjects, then remake the template with those Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote:
Hi Bruce, The workflow that I mentioned from the wiki is for creating a new template in the absence of any ?.sphere.reg files; here's relevant language from the webpage: ---------------- "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW) (This section reports on what I (GW) have learned of the registration process from Bruce Fischl. and Doug Greve, along with reading the source code. I have not actually tried it.) The process of creating a template involves calculating a "mean" (across subjects) pattern of curvature-related values, along with the variance of these variables. This task is performed by program mris_make_template. However, mris_make_template expects the input subjects to be already aligned (ie: already have ?h.sphere.reg files). This of course will not be the case if you are about to create a template!" ---------------- This is context for my question. Thanks, David On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: Hi David usually you need a ?h.sphere.reg as the ?h.sphere files are in (arbitrary) spherical coordinates, while the ?h.sphere.reg ones are in registered ones cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, David Romano wrote: Hi everyone, If I only have lh.sphere and lh.sulc files for each of collection of subjects, would this be enough information to generate a template for registering further subjects? I was thinking of trying to follow the workflow described on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates (in the section titled "Creating a registration template from scratch (GW)"), but wasn't sure whether more than just native spherical coordinates and convexity information would be implicitly required by the mris_make_template command. (The "Positional Arguments" table that appears on the page: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mris_make_template only asks explicitly for references to the hemisphere data for a collection of subjects.) Thanks in advance for you help, David Romano (P.S. There's also appers to be a typo in the "Positional Arguments" table I mentioned above: In the description section for position 2, the {hemi} and {sphere_name} values seem to be reversed.) The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu