Thanks, Koen. The issue is in my preliminary study this is the only subfield that shows a significant difference. So do you think it would still be worth reporting?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Koen Van Leemput koen@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
Hi Shashwath,
The label "hippocampus" was used in the tail of the hippocampus, where the manual labelers (who labeled the data our automated method is trained on) stopped trying to distinguish between the different subfields. If you want to compute the volume of the whole hippocampus, then you should take this in account - otherwise you can probably ignore it.
Hope this helps,
Koen
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Shashwath Meda shashwath123@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Koen - I am looking at some hippocampal subfield measures on 3T and 7T and noticed that there is a label called "hippocampus" from your recent publications it was unclear what this label exactly meant? Is this a
useful
subfield measure to be considered for further analysis? What does this particular segment represent? Thanks, Shashwath Meda
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in
error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.