Bruce, thank you so much.
Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical labels than FS 5.3?
Thank you so much again, best, Elisabetta
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Elisabetta
I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which is probably the source of the discrepancy
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi FS team, running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences
between the aseg and the
aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from
aseg. Could that cause
problems in accuracy? Thank you so much, best, Elisabetta
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
properly
dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer