Hi FS team, running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences between the aseg and the aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from aseg. Could that cause problems in accuracy? Thank you so much, best, Elisabetta
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Hi Elisabetta
I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which is probably the source of the discrepancy
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi FS team, running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences between the aseg and the aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from aseg. Could that cause problems in accuracy? Thank you so much, best, Elisabetta
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Bruce, thank you so much.
Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical labels than FS 5.3?
Thank you so much again, best, Elisabetta
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Elisabetta
I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which is probably the source of the discrepancy
cheers Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi FS team, running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences
between the aseg and the
aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from
aseg. Could that cause
problems in accuracy? Thank you so much, best, Elisabetta
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
properly
dispose of the e-mail.
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
I don't think very different, but certainly they will change On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
Bruce, thank you so much.
Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical labels than FS 5.3?
Thank you so much again, best, Elisabetta
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Elisabetta
I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which is probably the source of the discrepancy cheers Bruce On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote: > Hi FS team, > running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences between the aseg and the > aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive. > > My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from aseg. Could that cause > problems in accuracy? > Thank you so much, > best, > Elisabetta > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly > dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer-- Elisabetta C. del Re, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry Harvard Medical School phone 617 9675569 mail elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu
Thank you so much, OK, best, Elisabetta
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
I don't think very different, but certainly they will change On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
Bruce, thank you so much.
Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical
labels than FS 5.3?
Thank you so much again, best, Elisabetta
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl <
fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Elisabetta I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, whichis
probably the source of the discrepancy cheers Bruce On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote: > Hi FS team, > running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are somedifferences between the aseg
and the > aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive. > > My understanding is that volumes for global measures arecalculated from aseg. Could
that cause > problems in accuracy? > Thank you so much, > best, > Elisabetta > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the personto whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in errorand the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the PartnersCompliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sentto you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact thesender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
-
Bruce Fischl -
elisabetta_delre＠hms.harvard.edu