Dear Bruce, I did setup the "-run 015" not "013" in unpacksdcmdir as I told in previous message. But it generated the "013" folder automatically after running unpacksdcdir, which made me so confused. As it created the "013" folder, I guess unpacksdcmdir didnot recognized structure image correctly which was in the "15th" line of the scan.info. Thanks Bruce. All the best.
2013-12-16
Rujing Zha
发件人：Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 发送时间：2013-12-16 22:12 主题：Re: [Freesurfer] unpacksdcmdir: specifies unpacking rules from the command-line ERROR 收件人："Rujing Zha"charujing123@163.com 抄送："freesurfer"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
but why are you giving recon-all the path to run 013 instead of 015? I don't know the fsfast file structure, but your scan.info says that 013 is an EPI fun and 015 is the mprage
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Rujing Zha wrote:
Hi Bruce, It generated a 013 subfolder in after running this code "unpacksdcmdir -src ../data/liujunhao -targ ../work/liujunhao -fsfast -run 015 3danat mgz 001.mgz". It is 15 that I can see the number of t1_mpr_ns_sag_iso_zhang in the unpack.log. Then I ran "recon-all -i ../work/liujunhao/3danat/013/001.mgz -s liujunhao", and it finished without error. "recon-all -s liujunhao -all" was run and ERROR would be displayed: ERROR: input(s) cannot have multiple frames! The recon-all.log unpack.log and scan.info were unloaded in the attachment. Thanks. All the best.
2013-12-14
Rujing Zha
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.