24 Jul
2012
24 Jul
'12
10:17 a.m.
yes, that's right Bruce On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the correction!
So according to your email, the correct interpretation should be,
In the aparc_area_lh.txt, the surface area is one based on the white surface, not the pial surface, based on the historical naming.
In the aparc_meancurv_lh.txt, the mean curvature is one based on the Mean (not Gaussian) Curvature of the white surface, and not the pial surface.
That helps a lot! Much appreciated!
Best, Daniel