I wouldn't trust anything from the parcellations. Rerunning autorecon3 is probably the easiest thing to do
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [E] wrote:
Do you mean re-launching auto-recon 3? Also, I am visualizing those parcellations of data analyzed with the first version of freesurfer whereas I know have the latest one. Do you think this might be a point for some of them? Finally, does this affect the values of regional cortical thickness? Thanks, Francesca
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:07 PM To: Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [E] Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] parcellation issues
Hi Francesca,
usually that means the surface was regenerated but not the parcellation.
Try remaking the parcellation and see if it goes away.
cheers, Bruce On Tue, 15 May 2007, Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [E] wrote:
Dear Users: I would like to ask how to treat the data of a subject for whom segmentation worked alright but the parcellation looks like the one I am herein attaching.
Thanks, Francesca
Francesca Bagnato, MD-PhD Staff Scientist, NIB-NINDS-NIH Building 10, Room 5S205 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD, 20892-1400 MSC Phone #: (301) 594-1415 Fax #: (301) 402-0373