Hi Jessica,
the 1.5t scan looks kind of washed out and low contrast, but of course it's hard to tell from an image. The 3T looks much crisper. Were the sequence parameters matched? I'm not sure what you're trying to show with this. The 3T multi-channel scan will have a much, much higher SNR than the 1.5T single channel, so the results will not at all be comparable.
Bruce
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Jessica Liu wrote:
Looking at the scans (attached, 3T on the left and 1.5T on the right, yellow hippocampus), I think you've made a good point. More comments are much appreciated, thanks!
Jessica Liu
2011/6/23 Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior ppj@netfilter.com.br This is not normal. Maybe you should check the aseg volume for improper segmentation.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 19:27, Jessica Liu jessicaliu92@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone!
I'm currently a summer student working at a lab which uses Freesurfer to measure hippocampal volumes. I noticed that scanning the same patient first on a GE 3T (Multi-channel head coil) and then a GE 1.5T (single-channel head coil) 24 hours later resulted in a 30% increase in the left hippocampus volume and a 18% increase for the right hippocampus based on the values in aseg.stats. Can anyone please comment on this and explain the large discrepancies? Thanks!
Jessica Liu
Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.