Dear Katharina, First of all, and to avoid any confusion, the bug only affected the script to gather the volumes from different subjects (“quantifyThalamicNuclei.sh”), and not the segmentations themselves. Would you mind sharing some images, showing how/where the LGN is oversegmented, please? It would be very helpful to better understand the problem. Kind regards, /Eugenio
-- Juan Eugenio Iglesias http://www.jeiglesias.com
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Katharina von Kriegstein katharina.von_kriegstein@tu-dresden.de Date: Monday, February 26, 2024 at 5:16 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Cc: Chelsea Jarrett chelsea.jarrett@tu-dresden.de, Hannes Ruge hannes.ruge@tu-dresden.de Subject: [Freesurfer] Too large volumes thalamus segmentation in version 7.2 Dear List,
We are using the thalamic segmentation and have encountered too large nuclei volumes. We are aware of the bug in previous Freesurfer versions reported here https://secure-web.cisco.com/1IbBjsoyLKSxbo51anCmnlGJ7AZlAHQC-iMHoutsQKt5emo... . In version 7.2 this bug is fixed.
Does someone else have similar difficulties with too large volumes? For example, our LGN is 259 mm3 (left) and 304 mm3 (right), while in the original paper for the thalamus segmentation (Iglesias et al. 2018), it is 124 mm3, which is close to the size reported by histological studies.
Thanks for reading! Katharina
_ _
Katharina von Kriegstein
Professor of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience Vice-Dean Faculty of Psychology
TUD Dresden University of Technology Chemnitzer Str. 48b, 01187 Dresden
Phone +49 (0) 351-463-43145
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1gJ3pcdCtydEP4JcYC_B04s_xcYKuSS0r7VoHh7Z0azmyON... https://secure-web.cisco.com/12zaO7jd5zPchZlNamn2OOwsicMw7Cg6FNxaL13gnPuKZwQ...