It is hard to tell from those images, but the registration does not look that bad. It would be more informative to have images that are not on the midline.
On 6/27/2019 4:09 PM, Nasiriavanaki, Zahra wrote:
Dear Freesurfers
Hi
I checked the functional to anatomical data registration using tkregister-sess -s $subj -fsd bold -per-run -bbr-sum. (The functional data is only collected from parietal and occipital lobes in 7T scanner).
The values obtained from tkregister-sess are too high (0.95) for 7 out of 8 runs.
When I looked at the snapshots obtained from QA_tools, they looked ok (top row images). But, when I looked at the volumes of the individual runs using tkregister2 command, the registration doesn't look good (bottom row images).
tkregister2 --s $subj --mov /$subj/bold/011/template.nii.gz --surf --reg new.dat --regheader .
I'm wondering if I need to do manual edits, and I appreciate any advice on that.
Thanks Mona
[cid:part1.F07CDD4A.AF97105B@mgh.harvard.edu][cid:part2.D6E3E6E4.1B7A8679@mgh.harvard.edu]
[cid:part3.070DE0A8.07061B0F@mgh.harvard.edu][cid:part4.6C462CD0.17C35CEF@mgh.harvard.edu]
Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, 149-2615
Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edumailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
