External Email - Use Caution
Hi Bruce, In that paper, you reported that MP2RAGE underestimates cortical thickness relative to MEMPRAGE and also has slightly lower reproducibility. Since Recon-all does not seem to have built in functionality to deal with the background noise in MP2RAGE, I am wondering whether you still recommend MEMPRAGE over MP2RAGE. I only have regular MPRAGE for comparison at the moment. Thank you, Caspar
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 19:56 Fischl, Bruce BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Caspar
Can you elaborate? What are the issues?
Bruce
*From:* freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
*On Behalf Of *Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
*Sent:* Monday, September 7, 2020 2:27 AM
*To:* Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* [Freesurfer] MEMPRAGE vs. MP2RAGE
External Email - Use Caution *Hi!
I was wondering whether the issues with surface reconstruction from MP2RAGE data that were reported for Freesurfer v5.1 in Fujimoto et al., 2014 still persist in more recent releases of Freesurfer, and whether there is information to what
extent they apply to 3T data?
Thank you!
Caspar
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.ed...