No. not really. This paper should be useful. Thanks for sending this along.
From: Alan Francis [mailto:alandarkenergy@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 9:47 AM To: Freesurfer freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; pnucleos@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer program for 7 Tesla
Hi Prasad:
Hope all is well. Has someone replied to you on this question? I have enclosed an interesting article that compares 3T vs 7T that might be useful in guiding your analysis.
best,
Alan
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, konasale prasad <pnucleos@gmail.com mailto:pnucleos@gmail.com > wrote:
Dear FSL experts,
We are trying to run freesurfer volume measurements, primarily subcortical regions along with cortical surface area and thickness. We are also interested in hippocampal subfields and shape analysis. I was wondering whether the program would be reliable compared to 3T (that we have done quite a few). Are there any known problems? If there are, please let me know the work arounds.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
