Freesurfer

freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

16 participants
30084 discussions

Hippocampal segmentations -- how to make manual adjustments
by Kathy Reding 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution I would like to manually adjust the hippocampal segmentations created by the hippocampal/amygdala sub-field segmentation pipeline. The hippocampal head boundary with the amygdala was poorly defined in my subjects (1mm isotropic images), and I would like to manually adjust this boundary. 1) I used the longitudinal pipeline (subjects had three visits each). Ideally, I would like to do this once per subject (i.e., on the subject average), but am not sure if that is possible, or if the subject average boundaries would maintain their accuracy once applied to each individual visit. If this is not possible, I would like to adjust only a single image per subject/visit (outline of the whole hippocampus) and apply it to two of to the three available segmentation (HBT, CA), or more importantly, extract the volumes in a similar manner to the FS provided sub-field output. 2) I would like to know how the alveus is assigned in the CA and HBT segmentations. It appears to be included in the hippocampus in my images, and I am curious if this is an error. Should it be excluded? Best, Kathy Reding

1 0

Recon-all autorecon2 exited with error
by Benjamin Ineichen 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, I edited the brainmask.mgz to erase some dura which caused problems with the pial surface in a subject. I then re-ran recon-all using: recon-all -qcache -s test1_edit -autorecon2 However, the recon-all finished with errors. Attached the log and error files. What is the problem? Thanks! /Ben -- ____________________________________ Benjamin Victor Ineichen, MD PhD Karolinska Institutet Center for Molecular Medicine Stockholm, Sweden ineichen(a)protonmail.ch +41 76 391 04 01 Dr. med. et Dr. rer. nat. ETH Benjamin Victor Ineichen Karolinska Institutet Center for Molecular Medicine Stockholm, Sweden ineichen(a)protonmail.ch +41 76 391 04 01

2 1

Re: [Freesurfer] Problem with registration (PetSurfer)
by Marina Fernández 12 Feb '20

12 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Doug, the full terminal output from the terminal after running tkregisterfv was: freeview -transform-volume -viewport cor -v /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/s_001/mri/orig.mgz:visible=0:name=orig.mgz(targ) /home/sleep2014/0_Analisis_Marina/PET/s_001_PET.nii:name=s_001_PET.nii(mov):reg=/home/sleep2014/0_Analisis_Marina/PET/s_001.reg.lta --surface /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/s_001/surf/lh.white:edgecolor=yellow --surface /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/s_001/surf/rh.white:edgecolor=yellow Warning: Transformation can only apply to volumes for now. If your data includes ROI/Surface/Way Points, please do not use this feature yet. MatrixAsciiReadFrom: could not scanf parms Source temporarily unavailable LTAchangeType: src geometry must be valid Source temporarily unavailable terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int' Abort Thanks for your attention. Marina.

1 0

freeview slow/choppy
by Octavian Lie 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Dear All, I recently changed from ubuntu 16.04 to 18.04 LTS, then reinstalled Freesurfer. As opposed to prior behavior, freeview image manipulation (mainly mouse-based rotations) are exceedingly choppy and slow. The screen briefly freezes after moving the mouse to rotate a volume, then jumps to the final volume position. Any thoughts? Thank you, Octavian

2 3

Job opening: Full/Part-time medical imaging scientist: PWI/DWI/ASL/SWI
by shi yao wang 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Dear list members, Please check the attached job ad for a medical imaging scientist position at Atlanta, GA. We need experts for medical imaging analysis, especially for PWI, DWI/DTI, ASL or SWI. The position could be part-time and projected based. Best regards Dr. Pauli Email: pauil.ma(a)szdrbrain.com

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Question re: hippocampal/amygdala subfields
by Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

That is correct, Tegan! And welcome to FreeSurfer ;-) Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com From: <freesurfer-bounces(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Tegan Hargreaves <thargrea(a)stjosham.on.ca> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 14:55 To: "'freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Question re: hippocampal/amygdala subfields External Email - Use Caution Hi all, I am fairly new to FreeSurfer and am implanting the hippocampal/amygdala subfields script in our participants. As there are two versions of the hippocampal script (i.e., version 10 that is only hippocampus and version 21 which is both), I wanted to confirm that I should be using FS v6.0 (stable) for recon-all, and then running only the hippocampal/amygdala (v21) script through the dev version of FS. I don’t believe that I should be running the exclusively hippocampal script anymore, as the guide states it is now obsolete, but I just wanted to confirm. Thank you so much! Best, Tegan Tegan Hargreaves, MSc Research Assistant Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research | St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L8P 3P2 P: 905-522-1155 ext. 36368 | E: thargrea(a)stjoes.ca<mailto:thargrea@stjoes.ca> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, saving, disclosure, re-transmission or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or this information has been inappropriately forwarded to you, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or the Privacy Office via privacy(a)stjoes.ca. Thank you. ________________________________

1 0

Problem with registration (PetSurfer)
by Marina Fernández 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Dear experts, I am following PetSurfer steps (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PetSurfer) Something was wrong using mri_coreg function because when I checked the registration with tkregisterfv this error was shown in the terminal: *Warning: Transformation can only apply to volumes for now. If your data includes ROI/Surface/Way Points, please do not use this feature yet.* *MatrixAsciiReadFrom: could not scanf parms* *Source temporarily unavailable* *LTAchangeType: src geometry must be valid* Can you help me? *I use these commands:* dcm2niix s_001_PET_dicom (to convert dicom PET files to nii)gtmseg --s s_001mri_coreg --s s_001 --mov s_001_PET.nii --reg s_001.reg.ltatkregisterfv --mov s_001_PET.nii --reg s_001.reg.lta –surfs And it happens with all the subjects. Thank you in advance.Best regards,Marina.

2 1

(no subject)
by Alan Francis 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Hi Eugenio - Hope you are well. I am trying to extract the HSF from a group of processed brains. Previously I used the command: quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh 195950 HSF_Cannabis Has this changed? If so what is the new command? Thanks, Alan -- *|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|* *Alan N. Francis PhDInstructor in PsychiatryHarvard Medical School* *Louis V. Gerstner III scholarMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging* *Massachusetts General Hospital* *149, 13th street, Charlestown, MA* *alanf(a)bwh.harvard.edu <ezra_wegbreit(a)brown.edu> * *afrancis(a)mclean.harvard.edu <afrancis(a)mclean.harvard.edu>*

1 0

Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file
by Bronwyn Overs 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Hi Kersten, Thank you so much for your detailed explanation. 1. Sorry I did make a mistake with a couple of the beta values in the word doc I sent through. Also, you were correct that you should be looking at the 8th position. 2. Thank you for this code. I have now used it to automate the extraction of all the beta values and to write each set of beta values into an mgh file for viewing. 3. Being aware of the index differences between matlab and freesurfer has completely solved my problem for the age and groupXtime clusters. I have reextracted all of the beta values and everything is matching up perfectly now. I am still having a problem with the first cluster in the table I sent throught (cluster index A, rh, area, B1, time in CON). I have attached a new updated composite image which has the accurate uncorrected beta value and a scatterplot including a trend line. As you can see from the scatterplot there is a very slight increase in the raw area values over time. However, the sign of the p-value and uncorrected beta values indicate that there should be a decrease over time. Could this be caused by the fact that I am graphing raw area values that do not take the other model covariates into account? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Bronwyn Overs" <b.overs(a)neura.edu.au> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 4:11:08 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file Hi Bronwyn, thanks for your very detailed materials, that helped a lot to get quickly into the topic: I have not checked everything yet, but want to share a few initial thoughts, as this might advance the discussion already: 1. I have started looking at the 'lh.thickness.stack.R2C.fwhm20.lmem.final.190313.mat' file, specifically looking for the maximum vertex 113776, which is mentioned in your table. I have to admit that I cannot identify a corresponding beta - value of 0.000378823 at the 8th position of the stats_final.Bhat vector. I.e. 'stats_final(113776).Bhat(8)' gives me something different. Am I correct in looking at the 8th position for the effect in question? Maybe you can check / help here? 2. It can be helpful to write out beta.mgh files and compare them with the significance mgh files. There should be some (close) correspondence regarding the sign and spatial distribution of the two overlays, at least this is what I see here. I use the following code for writing out the 8th column of the design matrix, which if I am not mistaken should be the interaction of group and time. nv=length(stats_final); Beta = zeros(1,nv); for i=1:nv if ~isempty(stats_final(i).Bhat) Beta(i) = stats_final(i).Bhat(8); end; end; mri1 = mri; mri1.volsz(4) = 1; fs_write_Y(Beta,mri1,'Beta8.mgh'); 3. Maybe a crucial point is that indices in Matlab are 1-based, while in Freeview they are 0-based (sorry - it would have been better if I had written that earlier, but I just had to remind me of this discrepancy myself): Let's take the beta.mgh file from above, i.e. beta coefficient #8 from the 'lh.thickness.stack.R2C.fwhm20.lmem.final.190313.B7.sig.mgh' analysis, and load it in Freeview. Navigating to vertex (e.g.,) 35149 in Freeview gives a beta value of -0.0215902 (see the lower part of the Freeview GUI), and this corresponds to the value that we get from stats_final(35150).Bhat(8) in Matlab. Note the +1 increment for the matlab index. This principle should hold for any vertex, maybe you can check for a few others. I speculate that also indices from the mri_surfcluster reports are 0-based (but I still need to validate if my memory is correct here). Going back to the max vertex mentioned above, when I navigate in Freeview to its position (#113776; can also be identified by raising the significance threshold to -3.6, which is just below the max significance of the cluster in question, and should in the middle temporal region show just this vertex), I get a significance value of -3.6213, which is nicely consistent with your table. From the 'Beta8.mgh' file, I get at the same position an estimate of -0.0181921 (which at least has the right sign), and corresponds to the value of stats_final(113777).Bhat(8) in Matlab, which is -0.018192064131756. These are just a few first impressions, let me know if anything remains unclear. Best regards, Kersten On Di, 2020-02-04 at 11:39 +0100, Diers, Kersten /DZNE wrote: Hello Bronwyn, thanks for uploading the files, I will take a look at them today or tomorrow, and email you then. Best regards, Kersten On Mo, 2020-02-03 at 15:04 +1100, Bronwyn Overs wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hi Kersten, Thank you very much for offering to take a look at my files. I was happy to wait until you returned from your travels and I hope you had a good tripe. I have now uploaded all the relevant files and details to [ mailto:mreuter@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | mreuter(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] using the filedrop system. This was done in two separate batches due to size restrictions on the uploads. Please let me know if you require any more information and I look forward to hearing from you again. Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Bronwyn Overs" <b.overs(a)neura.edu.au> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 7:33:15 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file Hi Bronwyn, thanks for your mail and detailed description. To best assess the issue, it would be helpful if we can replicate it. So if you can share it, I would appreciate if you can make available to us the specific commands that you ran to create the clusters and to extract the betas, plus the corresponding mgh or Matlab mat files. One issue is that I am currently traveling without easy access to Matlab. I will be back in the office on Feb 3rd. So please let me know if it is more urgent than beginning of February; I may be able to investigate at least the Freesurfer commands earlier than that. Best regards, Kersten Kersten Diers Image Analysis Group German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Sigmund-Freud-Straße 27 | 53127 Bonn | Germany https://www.dzne.de/en/sites/bonn/research-groups/reuter.html Phone: +49 228 43302 381 From: Bronwyn Overs <b.overs(a)neura.edu.au> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 3:46 AM To: Diers, Kersten /DZNE Cc: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file Hi Kersten, Based on your previous suggestions I have located lhstats(i).Bhat and extracted the unstandardized beta values that corresponds to the 'Max Vertex' for each cluster in my cluster summary file. Unfortunately, I have identified an issue with two of my clusters for the effect of group X time, and one of my clusters for the effect of baseline age. In all instances the unstandardized beta value for the 'Max Vertex' is positive. In contrast, the negative sign of the Max log 10 p-value and plots of the mean cluter-wise cortical thickness values indicate that these effects should be negative. For the group X time clusters in question I have attached a composite image ('lme_ubetaissue_groupXtime_thickness.png') showing each cluster mapped onto its' relevant inflated cortical surface, as well as plots of the mean cortical thickness values for each cluster, and the relative 'Max' and unstandardised beta values. Do you have any idea what could be causing the discrepancy i'm seeing? Should I be averaging across all of the unstandardized beta values for a given cluster to get an estimate of the effect size? In addition to this issue, I have also encountered a problem with one of my clusters for the effect of time on cortical area. Here both the log 10 p and unstandarized beta values are negative, but on plotting the mean cortical area values the line of best fit indicates that area is increasing over time. I have attached a second composite image that displays these issues ('lme_plotissue_time_area.png'). Any insight you can provide on either of these issues will be greatly appreciated, and I am happy to supply additional information and files if requried. Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Bronwyn Overs" <b.overs(a)neura.edu.au> To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 10:08:03 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file External Email - Use Caution Thank you very much Kersten! Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 9:20:49 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file External Email - Use Caution Hi Bronwyn, you can just add the two betas: it's the slope for the non-case group plus the difference in slopes between case and non-case group, so it should give the slope in the case group. Best regards, Kersten On Mi, 2019-12-11 at 12:53 +1100, Bronwyn Overs wrote: BQ_BEGIN External Email - Use Caution Hi Kersten, Thank you for all of your help so far. I have now located the unstandardized beta values in lhstats(i).Bhat. Unfortunately one of the effects I was interested in was the slope for years within my case group, which required the use of the following contrast vector: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Do you know how I could estimate the effect size for this contrast given that it corresponds to two beta values (1 and 7)? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2019 6:50:26 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file External Email - Use Caution Hi, please see my inline responses below. Best, Kersten On Fr, 2019-11-29 at 13:20 +1100, Bronwyn Overs wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hi Kersten, Thank you this is a good suggestion. Where can I get the unstandardized beta values for the lme I have already run? They are in e.g. lhstats(i).Bhat; see the tutorial webpage for some explanation. BQ_BEGIN Also, i'm not really sure how to interpret the unstandardized beta values for interaction effects like group X years, do you have any suggestions? BQ_END This would model a difference in slopes, right? So the beta value should reflect difference between the two particular groups of this contrast per year (if year is the unit of time). BQ_BEGIN Finally, do you know why the max vertex is listed as '-inf' for my largets cluster and is this a problem at all? BQ_END I can only speculate here, but it's probably worth checking: A sig value of 'Inf' would correspond to a p-value of (exactly) zero. So, one might investigate if any zeros are contained within the p-value arrays / maps, and if these zeros (if any) reflect the outcome of a statistical test (then it should be no problem) or if they were erroneously introduced. BQ_BEGIN Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Bronwyn Overs" <b.overs(a)neura.edu.au> Cc: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 8:39:55 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file Hello, and thanks for the explanation! Here's my first impression: I do not think that there is a really satisfying solution given these particular stats maps and the effect size measure you describe. I may be missing something, but I also have to admit that it is not immediately clear to me what motivates the choice of cohen's d (and the calculation you describe) in the current scenario - I've always thought of it as a measure of 'difference in means'. In a regression context, I would personally look for a measure of the "variance-explained" type. There seem to be at least two papers (Xu, 2003, Statistics in Medicine, and Selya, 2012, Frontiers) that cover these for mixed effects models. The calculation/implementation of these measures seems to be, however, not as straightforward as for classical multiple regression models; and as far as I can see, it would also involve fitting Null or reduced models, and thus running analyses again. By far the easiest and most straightforward way in my eyes is to report unstandardized effect sizes, i.e. beta estimates, as you have clearly interpretable main variables (group and time) with intuitive units that should be comparable across studies from your field. So maybe this is an argument not to standardize, and to state the effect size in terms of "change in thickness per year" etc.? Best regards, Kersten On Do, 2019-11-28 at 11:29 +1100, Bronwyn Overs wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hi Kersten, No problem at al and thank you for your reply. While running my correction for multiple comparisons I store the df associated with each contrast vector using the following: [~,~,dflh] = find(F_lhstats.df(2,:)); [~,~,dfrh] = find(F_rhstats.df(2,:)); dfmodelh = {floor(mode(dflh))}; dfmoderh = {floor(mode(dfrh))}; So far the dfmodelh and dfmoderh have been identical. I then calculate the effect size for each cluster using the following steps: 1. Derive the p-value from the Max threshold ('Max'), where p = 10 to the power of -abs(Max) 2. Calculate the t-value associated with this p-value, using the relevant df for this contrast 3. Calculate cohen's d using 't' and 'df', where d = (t*2)/(sqrt(df)) When the Max threshold is listed as -inf I cannot complete these calculations. Can you suggest an alternate method for generating effect sizes for these clusters? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Kersten Diers, DZNE" <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 12:29:18 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file External Email - Use Caution Hi Bronwyn, Doug, sorry - I missed the other mail from two weeks ago (and have been absent for a few days), but I'm able to take a look now. You mention that your goal is to calculate effect sizes. Could you briefly let us know how you are planning to do it - this would help me to better understand the issue. Thanks, Kersten On Di, 2019-11-26 at 23:14 +0000, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote: BQ_BEGIN can you send the cluster summary file? On 11/24/2019 7:09 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: BQ_BEGIN External Email - Use Caution Hi Kersten, Following on from Douglas's reply, you may remember my analysis as I forwarded you some files in October (see [ https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg64148.html | https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg64148.html ] ). I followed your suggestions of removing the '--thmax 5' argument form 'mri_surfcluster', and now the labels generated by 'mri_label2label' overlap perfectly with the significance maps from the LME. However, now my largest clusters have a maximum threshold of '-inf' in my cluster summary files. Do you have any idea how to get around this problem so that I can use my max threshold values to calculate cluster-wise effect sizes? Kind regards, Bronwyn Overs Research Assistant Neuroscience Research Australia Margarete Ainsworth Building Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1725 [ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ] [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | Twitter ] | [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | Facebook ] | [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | Subscribe ] From: "Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D." [ mailto:DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu | <DGREVE(a)mgh.harvard.edu> ] To: "Freesurfer support list" [ mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> ] , "Kersten Diers, DZNE" [ mailto:Kersten.Diers@dzne.de | <Kersten.Diers(a)dzne.de> ] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 4:23:12 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster summary file I'll have to leave this one for Kersten as it appears that the LME stuff is generating and inf value On 11/12/19 7:05 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Douglas, > > Yes I have looked at it in Freeview and I have attached a screenshot > for your reference. > > The /fsdata/lme/thickness/rh.thickness.B1B7.mgh file was generated > with a mass-univariate spatiotemporal model using > 'lme_mass_fit_EMinit' and then FDR correction was applied across both > hemispheres (lme_mass_FDR). I have provided analysis details and > syntax below. The B1B7 contrast represents the affect of years in cases. > > Sample: > Our sample includes 112 controls subjects, and 106 cases. All subjects > are aged between 12 and 30 years. 153 or these subjects have 2 > time-points (77 control, 76 cases), while the remaining 65 individuals > have only 1 MRI time-point. We also have mixed ethnicites - 165 > Caucasians, 23 Asians, and 30 mixed (Asians-Caucasians). > > The QDEC file contains the following 6 variables: > 1. Y (years between scans) > 2. A (baseline age) > 3. G (group, 1=case, 0=control) > 4. S (sex, 1=female, 0=male) > 5. E1 (Ethnicity 1, 1=asian, 0=other) > 6. E2 (Ethnicity 1, 1=mixed-asian-caucasian, 0=other) > > Design matrix: [ones(length(M),1) M M(:,1).*M(:,3)] > i.e. main effects for each of the qdec variables + an > interaction term for years X group > > DVs: Cortical thickness, area and volume > > Model: Mass-univariate spatiotemporal model using > 'lme_mass_fit_EMinit' > CODE: > % Read in surface files > [Y,mri] = fs_read_Y(mgh); > % Read in qdec file > Qdec = fReadQdec(qdec); > % Remove fsid from qdec > Qdec = rmQdecCol(Qdec,1); > % Store col 1 (fsid-base) in sID variable > sID = Qdec(2:end,1); > % Remove col 1 (fsid-base) from Qdec array > Qdec = rmQdecCol(Qdec,1); > % Convert Qdec to numeric matrix M > M = Qdec2num(Qdec); > % Sort data and evaluate design matrix > [M,Y,ni] = sortData(M,1,Y,sID); > X = eval([ones(length(M),1) M M(:,1).*M(:,3)]) > % Compute vertex-wise temporal covariance estimates. > [Th0, Re] = lme_mass_fit_EMinit(X,[1],Y,ni,cortex,3); > %Segmentation and model fitting. > [Rgs, RgMeans, stats] = fit(Th0, Re, [1], sphere, cortex, X, Y, > ni); > %Check surfaces. > surfcomp(Th0, RgMeans, sphere, fig1, fig2) > > Correction for multiple comparisons: FDR across both hemispheres > CODE: > P = [ F_lhstats.pval(lhcortex) F_rhstats.pval(rhcortex) ]; G = [ > F_lhstats.sgn(lhcortex) > F_rhstats.sgn(rhcortex) ]; > [detvtx, sided_pval, pth] = lme_mass_FDR2(P,G,[],0.05,0); > altfdr(r,2) = num2cell(abs(log10(lme_mass_FDR(P,0.05)))); > pcor = -log10(pth); > [~,~,dflh] = find(F_lhstats.df(2,:)); > [~,~,dfrh] = find(F_rhstats.df(2,:)); > dfmodelh(r,2) = {floor(mode(dflh))}; > dfmoderh(r,2) = {floor(mode(dfrh))}; > thrlh(r,2) = {pcor}; > thrrh(r,2) = {pcor}; > [~,dc] = size(detvtx); > dvtx(r,2) = {dc}; > > Kind regards, > > > Bronwyn Overs > > Research Assistant > > > Neuroscience Research Australia > Margarete Ainsworth Building > Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia > *M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1725 > > > neura.edu.au [ http://neura.edu.au/ | <http://neura.edu.au/> ] > > Twitter [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | <https://twitter.com/neuraustralia> ] | Facebook > [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | <https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia> ] | Subscribe > [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | <http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe> ] > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D." [ mailto:DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu | <DGREVE(a)mgh.harvard.edu> ] > *To: *"Freesurfer support list" [ mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | <freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> ] > *Sent: *Wednesday, November 13, 2019 2:44:25 AM > *Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] Max threshold marked as '-inf' in cluster > summary file > > It looks like you have one gigantic cluster with a value of -inf at > vertex 41. How did you generate > /fsdata/lme/thickness/rh.thickness.B1B7.mgh ? Have you looked at it in > freeview? > > On 11/11/2019 7:39 PM, Bronwyn Overs wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Dear Freesurfer Mailing List, > > I have completed an LME analysis in matlab and have generated a > number of different cluster summary files for my various > contrasts. In many of resulting cluster summary files the 'Max' > value for the largest cluster which encompasses most of the brain > surface is reported as infinity ('-inf'). Please find an example > file attached. As I was hoping to use these values to generate > effect size estimates, can you please tell me what alternate value > I could substitute here for 'Max'? > > Kind regards, > > > Bronwyn Overs > > Research Assistant > > > Neuroscience Research Australia > Margarete Ainsworth Building > Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia > *M* 0411 308 769 *T* +61 2 9399 1725 > > > neura.edu.au [ http://neura.edu.au/ | <http://neura.edu.au/> ] > > Twitter [ https://twitter.com/neuraustralia | <https://twitter.com/neuraustralia> ] | Facebook > [ https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia | <https://www.facebook.com/NeuroscienceResearchAustralia> ] | > Subscribe [ http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe | <http://www.neura.edu.au/help-research/subscribe> ] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> ] > [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] > [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] > [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer BQ_END BQ_END _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [ mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu | Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] [ https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer | https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer(a)nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer BQ_END BQ_END

1 0

Using Buckner Cerebellar Parcellation
by Davide Momi 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

External Email - Use Caution Dear expert, I am trying to coregister the Buckner cerebellar parcellation ( http://www.freesurfer.net/fswiki/CerebellumParcellation_Buckner2011) in all my sample. However the results that I got using mri_vol2vol are not so good (see attached). Indeed in most cases the parcellation is bigger than the anatomical cerebellum of my subjects. Do you have any tips? Thanks

2 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Freesurfer