Re: [Freesurfer] aparc-aseg vs aseg label maps

Thank you so much, OK, best, Elisabetta

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Bruce Fischl fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

I don't think very different, but certainly they will change On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:

...

Bruce, thank you so much.

Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical

labels than FS 5.3?

...

Thank you so much again, best, Elisabetta

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl <

fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

...

  Hi Elisabetta

  I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which

is

...

  probably the source of the discrepancy

  cheers
  Bruce

  On Mon, 29 Jan
  2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:

  > Hi FS team,
  > running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some

differences between the aseg

...

  and the
  > aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
  >
  > My understanding is that volumes for global measures are

calculated from aseg. Could

...

  that cause
  > problems in accuracy?
  > Thank you so much,
  > best,
  > Elisabetta
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > Freesurfer mailing list
  > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  >
  >
  > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person

to whom it is

...

  > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error

and the e-mail

...

  > contains patient information, please contact the Partners

Compliance HelpLine at

...

  > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent

to you in error

...

  > but does not contain patient information, please contact the

sender and properly

...

  > dispose of the e-mail.
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  _______________________________________________
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer